Client-readiness
Will the report be clean enough for an account lead to use in a call, or will it feel like raw AI output?
Make the first client-tied report feel safe enough to buy.
Cold volume produced no replies, so the next growth signal needs a trusted buyer with a real client problem. This card gives the referrer a low-risk promise: one narrow packet, public-source receipts, and an objection capture if the buyer still will not pay.
Agencies do not fear $11. They fear looking sloppy to a client.
Source quality
Will claims be tied to public evidence and visible receipts, or will the buyer have to verify everything again?
Time cost
Will intake and review consume more operator time than the cheap packet saves?
Use this offer when forwarding to one agency operator.
One client/prospect only
Pick a named local business, creator, or client. Task Agents should solve one immediate research job, not pitch a platform rollout.
Receipts before opinion
The buyer should expect public-source notes, concrete findings, and a short next-action list — not a generic AI strategy memo.
Buy or name the blocker
If they would not pay $9–$19, capture the exact blocker: client-readiness, source depth, turnaround, examples, price, or wrong use case.
Manual 1:1 copy for an approved trusted channel.
I’m trying to make Task Agents safer for agency use: tiny AI research packets with public-source receipts, not a SaaS pitch. Do you have one client/prospect where an $11 website roast or $15 review-mining packet would save prep time this week? If not, what specifically would stop you from trusting it — source quality, client-readiness, turnaround, or the sample?
Count only revenue-quality signal.
Success for this test: one paid starter order, one client-tied sample request, or one exact trust objection in the buyer’s words. A compliment, vague curiosity, or “AI is interesting” is not demand.