A
Paid intent
Buyer names a client/prospect and chooses Website Roast, Review Mining, TikTok Competitor, or Shortform Script Pack. Route to checkout with source tag.
Log replies by revenue signal, not politeness.
Task Agents should not count a warm intro as progress unless it produces a paid starter order, a client-tied sample request, or a named trust objection. This ledger gives Dimitri a tight way to classify one approved personal reply before changing the offer or asking for another intro.
B
Proof request
Buyer asks for a sample tied to a real use case. Send proof pack or specific sample; ask which trust gap remains.
C
Objection
Buyer says why they would not buy: quality, source receipts, turnaround, client-readiness, price, privacy, or who owns follow-up.
Polite replies are not demand.
“Looks cool”
No client, no task, no objection. Reply with one narrow question or stop.
“Maybe later”
No active deadline. Log as unqualified timing, not pipeline.
“Send the catalog”
Too broad. Redirect to one starter report matched to their current client work.
One-row CRM format for each approved warm reply.
| Field | Value to capture | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Referrer | Name + relationship strength | Separates trusted route from weak forwarding. |
| Buyer context | Agency/freelancer/operator + live client or prospect | Confirms the reply is attached to paid work. |
| Chosen packet | Website Roast / Review Mining / TikTok Competitor / Shortform Script Pack / other | Shows which offer wedge has revenue pull. |
| Reply class | A paid intent / B proof request / C objection / D unqualified | Keeps reporting decision-grade. |
| Next action | Checkout link, sample link, objection fix, or stop | Prevents vague follow-up from becoming fake pipeline. |
If the reply is vague, force one concrete signal.
Helpful — to keep this from becoming generic AI curiosity, which one is closest: (1) you have a client/prospect where a $9–$19 website roast, review-mining packet, or shortform script pack would be useful this week; (2) you want to see a specific sample before judging; or (3) there is a trust gap that would stop you from buying?